Inefficiency of Kocher and Caird’s Criteria in Septic Arthritis of the Hip Due to Kingella kingae: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(SAH-KK) can be misdiagnosed, as it does not meet classic septic joint criteria (fever > 38.5°, pain, limited range of motion, and inability to bear weight). The objective of this study was to report clinical and paraclinical characteristics in a large cohort of children with confirmed SAH-KK and to evaluate the reliability of the Kocher (KC) and Caird criteria (CC) in predicting SAH-KK. Medical records of 140 children with confirmed SAH-KK were collected. Data on sex, age, temperature on admission, weight-bearing status, white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count, C-reactive protein (CRP) value, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were extracted. The study focused on the sensitivity of KC (body temperature, refusal to bear weight, leukocytosis, and ESR) and CC (KC criteria plus CRP level). All patients had bacteriologically confirmed SAH-KK; most had mild symptoms and near-normal inflammatory markers. CRP (76.2%) had the highest sensitivity, followed by weight-bearing status (73.8%) and WBC count (69.6%). Body temperature and ESR exceeded cutoff values in less than 50% of cases. Among 77 patients fulfilling all KC, 49 (63.5%) had less than a 40% probability of SAH. Of 50 children with complete CC, 20 (40%) had a 62.4% or lower probability of SAH. KC and CC are not sufficiently accurate to confidently exclude SAH-KK in preschool-aged children due to heterogeneous clinical presentations. Further studies are needed to redefine diagnostic criteria based on patient age and causative pathogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".