MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414896846 · doi:10.1007/s40120-025-00838-3

The Use of Long-Acting Injectables for People with Schizophrenia: Consensus Panel Recommendations for Overcoming Barriers and Implementing Treatment

2025· article· en· W4414896846 on OpenAlexafffund
John M. Kane, Ofer Agid, David Castle, Leslie Citrome, Andrea Fagiolini, Taishiro Kishimoto, Carlos A. Larrauri, Stefan Leucht, José M. Rubio, Martha Sajatovic, Nina R. Schooler, Christoph U. Correll

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersAllerganHLS TherapeuticsIdorsia PharmaceuticalsH. Lundbeck A/SMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma CorporationMylanAstellas PharmaEisaiUniversity of OxfordNational Health and Medical Research CouncilUniversity of CambridgeCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSunovionServierSeqirusFondation Brain CanadaBristol-Myers SquibbIndiviorTeva Pharmaceutical Industries
KeywordsMEDLINEAlternative medicinePanel discussionExpert opinionHealth professionals

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antipsychotic medications are effective for people living with schizophrenia, but long-term treatment adherence remains challenging, leading to relapses and poor outcomes. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) may improve adherence and reduce relapses compared with oral antipsychotics. Barriers to the use of LAIs exist, yet practical recommendations to overcome them are lacking. Therefore, an expert consensus panel was formed to develop key recommendations using a modified Delphi panel method. The panel chair and Interactive Forums, Inc., conducted a narrative literature review of English-language articles published in the 10 years before 02/02/2024. Panelists rated, discussed, and re-rated proposed statements during 2 online premeetings and 2 virtual group meetings in 2024. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement. The consensus panel initially included 9 experts and was expanded to 12, representing 6 countries and diverse psychiatric and lived experiences. In the first round, 31 recommendations were developed, with a high level of agreement; these were refined to 26 statements in the second round. Recommendations covered: (1) overcoming barriers to LAI initiation and use for the treatment of people with schizophrenia, and (2) procedures for initiation and switching, monitoring, and maintenance of LAIs for people with schizophrenia. The panel recommended that healthcare professionals (HCPs) consider LAIs proactively and initiate them early after a confirmed schizophrenia diagnosis. The importance of continued treatment with LAIs and their role in assessing nonadherence and treatment resistance were also highlighted. Further, the panel recommended that HCPs evaluate any personal biases about LAIs and engage in training/education to support goal setting and shared decision-making with patients and caregivers. Guidance on switching between antipsychotic formulations and maintaining treatment was also provided. This expert consensus panel provided recommendations to guide HCPs on how to overcome barriers to LAI use and to implement, monitor, and maintain LAIs as routine schizophrenia treatment. Antipsychotic medicines can work well for people living with schizophrenia, but some struggle to take their pills every day. Antipsychotic medicines that are injected and can be given once every 2 weeks or once every 2-, 3-, or 6-months work for a long time and can help these people; however, there are some problems that prevent patients from getting these injectable antipsychotics. A group of experienced doctors came together to give suggestions that other doctors can use to successfully offer injectable antipsychotics to their patients. The group had 2 meetings to work on the suggestions. The experts advised that the injectable antipsychotics should be given to patients as early as possible. Once people living with schizophrenia start taking the injectable antipsychotics, they should take them for as long as possible to stay healthy. These medicines are given by a healthcare professional, which makes them easier to use because doctors and caregivers know when patients miss an injection and can help them remember to get the injection. Injectable antipsychotics can also help doctors know if the medicines do not work for some patients. Doctors, nurses, patients, and caregivers all need good training to help them decide which long-acting injectable antipsychotic to use. The suggestions from the expert doctors will teach other doctors how to switch patients from antipsychotic pills to an injectable antipsychotic or from one injectable antipsychotic to another. They will also help doctors learn how to keep patients who are taking these medicines healthy for longer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology and TherapySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207