Finding a link between the TRPV4 ion channel and angiogenesis: a potential therapeutic target for vascular remodeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, is crucial in ischemic heart disease to improve blood supply to the heart. Meanwhile, in cancer, inhibiting angiogenesis can limit tumor growth by reducing oxygen and nutrients. Calcium ions, key in cellular functions like proliferation and migration, play an important role in this process. Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel, Vanilloid Subfamily Member 4 (TRPV4), a calcium-permeable channel, is highly expressed in endothelial cells lining blood vessels. This study explored the connection between TRPV4 and angiogenesis using an aortic ring assay. Aortic rings from 3-day-old C57Bl/6 pups were exposed to TRPV4 agonist (GSK1016790) and antagonist (HC067047) and standard growth media (control) after which maximal length and number of new sprouts were measured. The study found that the antagonist significantly reduced the number and length of new micro vessels, while the agonist increased sprout length. These findings highlight TRPV4's role in vascular remodeling, suggesting it could be a therapeutic target for treating diseases related to impaired blood flow and abnormal angiogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".