MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414907880 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452908

The thermodynamic structure and large-scale structure filament in MACS J0717.5+3745

2025· article· en· W4414907880 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Paul Breuer, N. Werner, Tomáš Plšek, François Mernier, Keiichi Umetsu, A. Simionescu, Mark J. Devlin, Luca Di Mascolo, Taylor Dibblee-Barkman, S. Dicker, Brian Mason, Tony Mroczkowski, C. Romero, Craig L. Sarazin, Jonathan Sievers

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersGrantová Agentura České RepublikyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science and Technology Council
KeywordsROSATRedshiftProtein filamentCluster (spacecraft)Range (aeronautics)Akaike information criterionThermalGalaxy cluster

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the results of Chandra and XMM-Newton X-ray imaging and spatially resolved spectroscopy, along with new MUSTANG2 90 GHz observations of the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect on MACS J0717.5+3745. This exceptionally massive (3.5 ± 0.6 × 10 15 M ⊙ ) Frontier Fields cluster located at intermediate redshift ( z = 0.5458) is experiencing multiple mergers and hosting an apparent X-ray bright large-scale structure filament. We produced thermodynamical maps from Chandra, XMM-Newton, and ROSAT data using a new method to model the astrophysical and instrumental backgrounds. The temperature peak of 24 ± 4 keV is also the pressure peak of the cluster and it is spatially closely correlated with the SZ peak from the MUSTANG2 data. We characterised a potential shock candidate at the cluster centre, based on the sharp temperature and pressure gradient. We also quantified its temperature-derived Mach number in various directions to span a range of ℳ = (1.7 − 2.0)±0.3. We used Bayesian X-ray analysis methods to disentangle different projected spectral signatures for the filament structure, with the Akaike and Bayes information criteria (AIC and BIC) used to select the most appropriate model to describe the various temperature components. We report an X-ray filament temperature of 3.1 +0.6 −0.3 keV and a density (3.78 ± 0.05)×10 −4 cm −3 , corresponding to an overdensity of ∼400 relative to the critical density of the Universe. We estimate the hot gas mass of the filament to be ∼6.1 × 10 12 M ⊙ , while its total projected weak-lensing measured mass is ∼(6.8 ± 2.7)×10 13 M ⊙ , indicating a hot baryon fraction of 4–10%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae→French-language works237,207→