MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414909915 · doi:10.1139/facets-2025-0085

The BC SUPPORT Unit: bringing patient-oriented research to bridge research and practice in health care

2025· article· en· W4414909915 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Monica Mamut, Stirling Bryan, Linda Li

Bibliographic record

VenueFACETS · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMental Health and Patient Involvement
Canadian institutionsMichael Smith Health Research BC
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMandateGovernment (linguistics)Bridge (graph theory)Health careUnit (ring theory)Focus (optics)Component (thermodynamics)Public health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the introductory paper in a collection of five papers on the BC SUPPORT Unit, a component of the pan-Canadian Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR), and is match funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the provincial government of British Columbia since 2016. In this introductory paper, we offer a brief overview of the Strategy, describe the ambition underlying the creation of the SUPPORT Unit in British Columbia, provide information on the Unit’s mandate and approach, and identify areas of ongoing priority focus for the Unit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.158
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.198
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1580.198
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.010
Science and technology studies0.0240.028
Scholarly communication0.0350.014
Open science0.0070.036
Research integrity0.0110.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.493
GPT teacher head0.624
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFACETSSame topicMental Health and Patient InvolvementFrench-language works237,207