MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414910084 · doi:10.2196/72996

Behavioral Intervention to Prevent HIV/AIDS Among Young Adults Using Motivational Culture-Based Communication: Protocol for a Research and Development Study

2025· article· en· W4414910084 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Moh. Khotibul Umam, Agus Setiawan, Henny Permatasari, Muchtaruddin Mansyur

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Health and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYoung adultIntervention (counseling)Protocol (science)Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Theory of planned behaviorBehavior changeProgram evaluation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: HIV/AIDS is an epidemic in 190 countries, with Indonesia having more than half a million people living with the virus. Risk factors include risky sexual activity and alternating needle usage. The majority of cases are young adults (aged 18 to 30 years). The Indonesian National HIV/AIDS strategy aims to reduce new cases to less than a thousand per year. Nowadays, effective prevention involves avoiding free sex and adopting healthier lifestyles. Objective: This research aimed to explore young adults' needs, perceptions, and cultural aspects of HIV/AIDS prevention, develop the intervention model, analyze its effectiveness, and examine its effect on HIV prevention behavior. Methods: We conducted the study in three phases: qualitative research, model development, and quantitative research. In the first phase, we used descriptive phenomenology and focus group discussion to collect data from young adults and stakeholders in Batang and Pekalongan regencies. The second phase developed a motivation model for HIV/AIDS prevention using motivational culture-based communication (MK-U) through website media. We designed the model in consultation with an information technology team and experts to ensure its suitability. The third phase involved a pre- and posttest with a control group quasi-experiment involving young adults aged 20-30 years in Batang and Pekalongan districts. The intervention group received culture-based motivational interviewing, while the control group received standard counseling. We analyzed the data using a generalized linear model and multivariate analysis of variance. Results: We expected to develop the MK-U model for HIV prevention behavior among young adults. In 2025, we implemented a community-based nursing research program for the MK-U model to prevent HIV/AIDS. Conclusions: In this research, we compare the results with similar studies, which will benefit program implementers and policymakers in both regions and enhance the effectiveness of HIV prevention programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.606
GPT teacher head0.709
Teacher spread0.104 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicAdolescent Health and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207