MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414910753 · doi:10.1103/6tq6-sr6w

Fermi surface and Berry phase analysis for Dirac nodal line semimetals: Cautionary tale from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>SrGa</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>BaGa</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math>

2025· article· en· W4414910753 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuxiang Gao, Yichen Zhang, Shiming Lei, M. K. Chan, Jonathan D. Denlinger, Sergey Gorovikov, S. Mishra, Yan Sun, Ming Yi, E. Morosan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Research Council CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationU.S. Department of EnergyGordon and Betty Moore FoundationOffice of Fossil EnergyUniversity of SaskatchewanWelch FoundationU.S. Department of Homeland SecurityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsZeeman effectGeometric phaseFermi surfaceDirac (video compression format)Position and momentum spaceLine (geometry)Phase (matter)SemimetalHarmonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Berry phase of odd multiples of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mi>π</a:mi> </a:math> inferred from quantum oscillations (QOs) has often been treated as evidence for nontrivial reciprocal space topology. However, disentangling the Berry phase values from the Zeeman effect and the orbital magnetic moment is often challenging. In centrosymmetric compounds, the case is simpler as the orbital magnetic moment contribution is negligible. Although the Zeeman effect can be significant, it is usually overlooked in most studies of QOs in centrosymmetric compounds. Here, we present a detailed study on the nonmagnetic centrosymmetric <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:msub> <b:mi>SrGa</b:mi> <b:mn>2</b:mn> </b:msub> </b:math> and <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:msub> <c:mi>BaGa</c:mi> <c:mn>2</c:mn> </c:msub> </c:math> , which are predicted to be Dirac nodal line semimetals based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Evidence of the nontrivial topology is found in magnetotransport measurements. The Fermi surface topology and band structure are carefully studied through a combination of angle-dependent QOs, angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), and DFT calculations, where the nodal line is observed in the vicinity of the Fermi level. Strong de Haas–van Alphen fundamental oscillations associated with higher harmonics are observed in both compounds, which are well fitted by the Lifshitz-Kosevich (LK) formula. However, even with the inclusion of higher harmonics in the fitting, we found that the Berry phases cannot be unambiguously determined when the Zeeman effect is included. We revisit the LK formula and analyze the phenomena and outcomes that were associated with the Zeeman effect in previous studies. Our experimental results confirm that <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <d:msub> <d:mi>SrGa</d:mi> <d:mn>2</d:mn> </d:msub> </d:math> and <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <e:msub> <e:mi>BaGa</e:mi> <e:mn>2</e:mn> </e:msub> </e:math> are Dirac nodal line semimetals. Additionally, we highlight the often overlooked role of spin-damping terms in Berry phase analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207