MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414918105 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202533701233

Quantum-Assisted Generative AI for Simulation of the Calorimeter Response

2025· article· en· W4414918105 on OpenAlexafffund
W. Fedorko, J. Quetzalcóatl Toledo-Marín, Geoffrey Fox, C. Gay, I-Hsuan Lu, Roger G. Melko, Deniz Sogutlu, M. Swiatlowski

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoPerimeter InstituteTRIUMF
FundersInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueMitacsGovernment of CanadaUniversity of VirginiaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLarge Hadron ColliderGenerative grammarDeep learningCalorimeter (particle physics)Fraction (chemistry)Luminosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As CERN approaches the launch of the High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC) by the decade’s end, the computational demands of traditional simulations have become untenably high. Projections show millions of CPU-years required to create simulated datasets - with a substantial fraction of CPU time devoted to calorimetric simulations. This presents unique opportunities for breakthroughs in computational physics. We show how Quantumassisted Generative AI can be used for the purpose of creating synthetic, realistically scaled calorimetry dataset. The model is constructed by combining D-Wave’s Quantum Annealer processor with a Deep Learning architecture, increasing the timing performance with respect to first principles simulations and Deep Learning models alone, while maintaining current state-of-the-art data quality

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207