MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414932935 · doi:10.1186/s12885-025-15007-w

Lifetime stressor exposure and depression among patients with pancreatic cancer: insights from the Florida Pancreas Collaborative

2025· article· en· W4414932935 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anthony DeSomma, Sebastian N. Maletz, Toni L. Basinski, Tiago Biachi De Castria, Mark Bloomston, Dung Tsa Chen, Wade G. Douglas, Kevin L. Huguet, Daniel Jeong, Kun Jiang, Dae Won Kim, Anjuli Luthra, José M. Pimiento, Sahana Rajasekhara, Vic Velanovich, Margaret A. Park, Grant S. Shields, George M. Slavich, Jennifer B. Permuth

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Cancer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsStressorDepression (economics)PsychosocialPancreasSurgical oncologyPsychological stressAssociation (psychology)Depressive symptoms

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although depression is reported to be higher among patients with pancreatic cancer than in the general population, research on depression and stress levels in this population is limited. METHODS: To address this gap, we investigated the prevalence of self-reported depression and lifetime stressor exposure in a cohort of treatment-naïve patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) or other types of pancreatic tumors such as pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms who received care at one of 15 institutions participating in the multi-institutional study Florida Pancreas Collaborative. Depression severity was assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC), and acute and chronic stressor exposure was assessed with the Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN). RESULTS: PDAC patients reported higher average depression symptom severity at the time of diagnosis and after 6 months compared to non-PDAC patients (p = 0.027 and p = 0.063, respectively). On the other hand, non-PDAC patients experienced a higher mean number and severity of lifetime stressors (p = 0.021 and p = 0.039, respectively) than PDAC patients. Across the sample, greater stressor exposure (measured by stressor count, severity, and event type) was associated with higher odds of clinically significant depressive symptoms. We also observed that chronic stressors were significantly associated with lower odds of advanced disease (OR = 0.896, p = 0.002). Among PDAC patients who completed both STRAIN and ESAS-r (n = 52), greater severity of acute life events was associated with a significant increase in ESAS-r depression scores between baseline and 6-month follow-up (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight distinct patterns of depression and stress across pancreatic tumor types and reveal a robust association between lifetime stress exposure and depressive symptoms. Together, they underscore the need for systematic screening and integrated psychosocial support for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC CancerSame topicCancer survivorship and careFrench-language works237,207