MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414937369 · doi:10.1097/qai.0000000000003775

Addressing Cognitive Symptoms in People With HIV: Outcomes From a Holistic Screening and Management Pathway

2025· article· en· W4414937369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kate Alford, Colin Fitzpatrick, Clara O’Brien, Eileen Nixon, Sube Banerjee, Jaime H. Vera

Bibliographic record

VenueJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionPsychological interventionCare pathwayCognitive impairmentHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Clinical pathwayMEDLINEDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation and outcomes of a cognitive screening and management pathway in people living with HIV within a large UK HIV service. METHODS: Since 2021, cognitive symptoms have been screened during routine HIV appointments using the cognitive screening questions endorsed by the European AIDS Clinical Society. Symptomatic individuals underwent the Montreal Cognitive Assessment; scores <26/30 prompted referral to a dedicated HIV-Memory clinic. Pathway data from 2021 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline and follow-up neuropsychological test results were compared. Cognitive impairment was defined by global and domain-specific Z scores, and changes in cognitive performance were evaluated using global deficit and reliable change index scores compared with norms through t-tests. The interventions delivered were quantified. RESULTS: Of the 2662 individuals attending the HIV service, 1518 (57%) received screening; 155 (10%) reported symptoms (mean age was 59.5 ± 11.6; 93.5% VL <40 copies/ml). In total, 71 (46% then completed a Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and 33 individuals (46.5%) scored <26. Among 136 HIV-Memory clinic attendees, 38 were followed up to track cognitive progression and intervention impact. 196 interventions were delivered, including comorbidity/lifestyle management (n = 33,31%), mental health support (n = 22, 19%), HIV-therapy adjustment (n = 16, 11%), and cognitive remediation (n = 11, 6%). Improvements were seen in global cognitive and most domains, notably delayed memory and executive function (both P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a cognitive screening and management pathway in routine HIV care is feasible. In individuals receiving management, cognitive performance generally remained stable or improved, highlighting the potential benefit of personalized interventions addressing holistic factors associated with cognitive impairment in people with HIV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency SyndromesSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207