MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414942010 · doi:10.1007/s11357-025-01927-9

Psycho-socio-economic factors and cardiorenal multimorbidity in middle to older-aged adults: cross-sectional results from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

2025· article· en· W4414942010 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Setor K. Kunutsor, Reyhaneh Rikhtehgaran, Anita Soni

Bibliographic record

VenueGeroScience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Disease Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of Canada
KeywordsOddsLongitudinal studyOdds ratioLogistic regressionPsychosocialMarital statusCohort studyCohortConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psycho-socio-economic factors (PSEFs) such as income, education, housing, and social support are known to influence health outcomes, yet their relationship with cardiorenal multimorbidity (CRM) remains poorly understood. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of CRM and examine its associations with PSEFs in a large, nationally representative Canadian sample. We analyzed baseline data from 19,370 participants (mean age: 60 years; 49.8% men) in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a prospective cohort of community-dwelling adults aged 45-85 years recruited between 2010 and 2015. CRM was defined as the co-existence of at least one cardiovascular disease and kidney disease. PSEFs assessed included household income, education, homeownership, marital status, employment status, and psychosocial variables. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for prevalent CRM. The overall prevalence of CRM was 0.83% (160 individuals), equivalent to 3.90 per 1000 individuals (95% CI 2.81-5.41). Prevalence increased with age and was higher among men than women (4.57 vs. 3.35 per 1000) and slightly higher in rural than urban areas (4.47 vs. 3.84 per 1000). Homeownership was associated with significantly lower odds of CRM (OR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.94). A household income of $50 K-99 K was associated with lower odds of CRM (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.39-1.00). No other PSEFs showed clear associations with prevalent CRM. CRM is relatively uncommon but shows variation by age, sex, and geography. Among the PSEFs assessed, homeownership and, to a lesser extent, moderate income were associated with reduced odds of prevalent CRM. These findings highlight the potential role of housing and economic stability in mitigating CRM risk. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the impact of PSEFs on the development and progression of CRM over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeroScienceSame topicChronic Disease Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207