MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414948188 · doi:10.48048/ajac.2026.17

Black Women, K-pop, and Global Fandom: A Critical Intersectional Review

2025· article· en· W4414948188 on OpenAlexaff
Zixin Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Arts and Culture · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Culture and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFandomIdentity (music)PoliticsRacismInclusion (mineral)Cultural studiesQueerAgency (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study systematically reviews and investigates the relationship between African American and K-pop fandom, examining how hybridity, cultural appropriation, racial capitalism, and identity work shape their participation in a globalised cultural form. A thematic literature review was conducted, drawing on 62 peer-reviewed literature sources published between 2000 and 2024. Databases searched included Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Keywords included K-pop, Black women, fandom, intersectionality, cultural appropriation, racial capitalism, and hybridity. Inclusion criteria prioritised works addressing race, gender, and fandom politics in relation to Korean popular culture. The analysis identifies five interlinked contradictions shaping Black women’s positionality in K-pop fandom: (1) the simultaneous familiarity and distance produced by K-pop’s Black cultural foundations, (2) the celebration of Black aesthetics alongside their erasure within industry structures, (3) the provision of gendered affective alternatives tempered by persistent stereotypes, (4) the coexistence of inclusive branding and anti-Black exclusion in fandom spaces, and (5) the tension between identity re-creation, activism, and the policing of critique. This review addresses a critical gap in fandom studies by centring Black women’s perspectives, revealing how their cultural affinity for K-pop coexists with racialised marginalisation, and developing a transferable framework for analysing contradictions in other transnational popular cultures. Highlights Reveals how K-pop’s African American cultural roots foster affinity while industry structures perpetuate racial exclusion Identifies five interlinked themes: hybridity, cultural appropriation, gendered affective connections, anti-Blackness, and identity re-creation. Demonstrates how Black women use fandom as a site for activism, cultural translation, and resistance. Offers a transferable framework for studying race, gender, and global fandom politics across transnational popular cultures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.011
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Journal of Arts and CultureSame topicAsian Culture and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207