MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414950392 · doi:10.1002/jclp.70050

Metacognitive Interpersonal Group Therapy for Adolescents With Emerging Personality Disorders: The Case of Nora

2025· article· en· W4414950392 on OpenAlexaff
Félix Inchausti, Nancy V. García‐Poveda, Sheila Martínez de la Hidalga González de Betolaza, Iranzu Iñigo Morrás, Raffaele Popolo, Giancarlo Dimaggio

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpersonal communicationMental healthPersonalityGroup psychotherapyInterpersonal relationshipIntervention (counseling)Personality disordersMetacognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An increasing number of adolescents attending child and adolescent mental health services present symptoms consistent with an emerging personality disorder (PD). Early identification and intervention are critical to preventing the devastating progression of symptoms, reducing the duration of untreated disorders, and supporting the recovery, development, and future quality of life of these individuals. The primary aim of this paper is to introduce a group therapy proposal designed for the entire spectrum of adolescent PDs: Metacognitive Interpersonal Group Therapy for Adolescents (MIT-GA). MIT-GA is a profoundly experiential interpersonal psychotherapy aimed at promoting the progressive growth of awareness and regulation of mental states, that is metacognition, and so alleviating symptoms and interpersonal problems. The paper first outlines the core principles of the treatment, its general structure, and session content. Next, it illustrates the therapeutic methodology through the case of Nora, a 16-year-old adolescent suffering from emerging, moderate PD with mixed features, primarily dependent and borderline. To evaluate the therapy's impact, quantitative and qualitative results are presented before and after the treatment, as well as 6 months post-therapy, focusing on symptomatology, interpersonal functioning, and overall functioning. Finally, the paper offers reflections on working with PDs, and discusses the advantages and challenges of MIT-GA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical PsychologySame topicPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyFrench-language works237,207