MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414953258 · doi:10.1115/pvp2025-156003

Validation of NDE Techniques for Characterizing Dealloyed Regions in Aluminum-Bronze Casting Components in Essential Cooling Water Systems

2025· article· en· W4414953258 on OpenAlexaff
Steven X. Xu, Jim Williams, R.T. Gonzales, Douglas A. Scarth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetallurgy and Material Science
Canadian institutionsKinectrics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipingSizingCastingComponent (thermodynamics)Nondestructive testingWeldingCharacterization (materials science)Structural integrity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Material degradation caused by selective leaching (dealloying) of aluminum in certain aluminum-bronze alloys is an environmentally induced degradation mechanism affecting piping systems containing cast components. Such material degradation has been observed in cast piping components fabricated to ASME SB-148 CA952 and CA954 specifications in ASME Code Class 3 essential cooling water systems. In-situ characterization of dealloyed regions in these components is important for determining the structural integrity of the dealloyed cast component in support of continued plant operation. A number of cast aluminum-bronze components were removed from service in support of validating non-destructive examination techniques for characterizing dealloyed regions. Prior to their removal, non-destructive examination inspections were performed to measure the extent of dealloying. The ex-service components were then destructively examined to validate non-destructive examination detection and sizing capabilities. This paper presents the results from the validation activities of the non-destructive examination technique for detecting dealloying. Good correlation was observed between the metallurgical examination and the adaptive ultrasonic imaging non-destructive examination inspection results, particularly the through-wall dealloying depth. Evidence from the metallurgical examination shows that the growth of dealloying over time is plug-like in nature (i.e., localized growth towards through-wall penetration). This paper also discusses approaches for addressing the uncertainties in non-destructive examination detection based on the destructive examinations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetallurgy and Material ScienceFrench-language works237,207