MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414968325 · doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09172-z

Limited effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on imaging outcomes in osteoarthritis: observational data from the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI)

2025· article· en· W4414968325 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Virginie Kreutzinger, Katharina Ziegeler, Johanna Luitjens, Gabby B. Joseph, J.A. Lynch, Nancy E. Lane, Charles E. McCulloch, Michael C. Nevitt, Thomas M. Link

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGlaxoSmithKlineNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationPfizerNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsObservational studySynovitisOsteoarthritisRheumatologySports medicineOrthopedic surgeryEpidemiologyCartilage damage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly prescribed for pain relief in osteoarthritis (OA), and their anti-inflammatory effects may play a role in shaping the disease course. The aim of this investigation was to examine the relationship between new use of prescription NSAIDs and changes in imaging biomarkers of synovitis in the knee, and to evaluate the association of NSAID use with structural cartilage damage over a period of four years. METHODS: Applying a new user design to identify treatment effects in observational data, we selected participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) who were prescribed regular, oral NSAID medication between baseline and 48 months follow-up and who had available 3T MRIs of the right knee with whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS) readings as well as semi-quantitative assessments of synovitis for both timepoints. These individuals were frequency-matched with non-NSAID users matching for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), baseline Kellgren & Lawrence (KL) grade, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores, and for the presence of an inflammatory imaging phenotype at baseline. Ordinal regression analyses and marginal estimated means were used to determine the effect of NSAID use on structural imaging outcomes, controlling for age, gender, BMI, and non-prescription NSAID use. RESULTS: In this longitudinal analysis over 48 months, 142 individuals met prespecified criteria for new NSAID exposure, and 707 matched controls were identified. Regression analyses did not show a significant association between new NSAID use and changes in effusion-synovitis, Hoffa's synovitis, or synovial proliferation scores over 4 years. However, NSAID users showed a significantly slower progression of cartilage lesions as measured by WORMS grading; this effect was marginally more pronounced in participants with an inflammatory imaging phenotype (beta - 0.92; p = 0.043) than in the population overall (beta - 0.48; p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: New NSAID use was not associated with MRI-detected synovitis over 4 years but had a modest association with reduced structural cartilage damage progression. This effect was more pronounced in individuals with an inflammatory imaging phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Musculoskeletal DisordersSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207