MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414971408 · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2025-basl.47

P31 Elafibranor impacts inflammatory, fibrotic and symptom-associated markers in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC): proteomic results from the ELATIVE trial

2025· article· en· W4414971408 on OpenAlexaff
Mark G. Swain, Pascale Plas, Maria del Pilar Schneider, Jacquie Maignel, Aurélie Martin, Nuno Antunes, George Harb, Hugo Gomes da Silva, Benjamin K. Miller, Lesley Tranter, Andrew L. Mason

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical endpointProtein expressionAcute-phase proteinImmune systemInflammationReceptorAgonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PBC is a rare, cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammation, fibrosis, and destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. Elafibranor, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist exerting effects on PPAR alpha and delta, was efficacious and well-tolerated in patients with PBC in the phase III ELATIVE® trial (NCT04526665). Here, longitudinal protein expression profiles were evaluated in serum samples from patients in ELATIVE®, to provide insights into the immunoregulatory mechanism of elafibranor in PBC. For patients in ELATIVE® who consented, serum samples were collected at baseline, Week 26, and Week 52. Longitudinal protein expression profiles were analyzed using Olink® Proximity Extension Assay technology. Two Olink® panels, Target 96 Immune Response and Explore HT, were used, covering >5,500 proteins. Quality control and data normalization were conducted by Olink®. Linear mixed models were fitted to each protein from baseline to Week 52. Statistically significant changes in protein expression were identified using the Benjamini-Hochberg method with a 5% false discovery rate. Proteins with statistically significant changes in expression were assessed in elafibranor-treated patients with and without biochemical response, according to the primary endpoint of ELATIVE®. Pathway analyses were conducted using QIAGEN® Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA®). Serum samples were analyzed from 121 patients, of whom 87 received elafibranor; 46 with and 41 without biochemical response at Week 52. Expression of control proteins, gamma-glutamyl transferase-1 (GGT1) and 5’-nucleotidase (NT5E), decreased with elafibranor treatment when measured by Olink® and standard methodologies, validating the use of Olink®. A network of >20 proteins involved in hepatic inflammation had statistically significant changes of expression in elafibranor-treated patients with biochemical response at Week 52. IPA® revealed a novel inflammatory signature, including downregulation of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) and SerpinA3. This network is known to be implicated in immune cell adhesion and inflammatory regulation, and maps to immunomodulation and fibrosis pathways. Similarly, biomarkers associated with itching and fibrosis, such as bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (BST2) or solute carrier family 39 member 14 (SLC39A14), were significantly downregulated. This is the first longitudinal proteomic analysis to characterize proteins with modulated expression in patients with PBC treated with elafibranor. These findings provide novel mechanistic insights into the anti-inflammatory effect of elafibranor in PBC, as well as the impact on proteins associated with PBC symptoms, through effects on PPAR alpha and delta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207