Balancing care and academic goals: how young adult carers navigate higher education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Young adult carers (YAC) often face unique challenges in higher education, yet their experiences remain underexplored. The objective of this study was to describe their experiences by comparing YAC with young adults who had an ill relative but were not carers (YANC) and with young adults without a sick relative (YAWSR). Participants included 436 students in higher education aged 18–30 years (122 YAC, 105 YANC and 209 YAWSR). They were asked to complete an online questionnaire about their school experience, the health of their loved ones, and the types of support potentially available to them. The school experience was analyzed using both objective (e.g., number of grades repeated and dropouts) and subjective indicators (i.e., self-report of academic, social, and emotional adjustment in the higher education context). The results of the study indicated that, while YAC did not self-rate their academic and social adjustment more negatively, they reported experiencing more emotional difficulties and a less linear academic trajectory in comparison to their peers in the other two groups. These findings highlight the importance of providing more support for YAC to improve their school experience in higher education, mental health, and future adult life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".