On the equivalence of $c$-potentiability and $c$-path boundedness in the sense of Artstein-Avidan, Sadovsky, and Wyczesany
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A cornerstone of convex analysis, established by Rockafellar in 1966, asserts that a set has a potential if and only if it is cyclically monotone. This characterization was generalized to hold for any {\color{black} finite-valued} cost function $c$ and lies at the core structure of optimal transport plans. However, this equivalence fails to hold for costs that attain infinite values. In this paper, we explore potentiability for an infinite-valued cost $c$ under the assumption of $c$-path boundedness, a condition that was first introduced by Artstein-Avidan, Sadovsky and Wyczesany. This condition is necessary for potentiability and it is more restrictive than $c$-cyclic monotonicity; however, this condition alone does not imply potentiability. We provide general settings and other conditions under which $c$-path boundedness is sufficient for potentiability, and therefore equivalent. We provide a general theorem for potentiability, requiring no topological assumptions on the spaces or the cost. We then provide sufficiency in separable metric spaces and costs that are continuous in their domain. Finally, we introduce the notion of a $c$-path bounded extension and use it to prove the existence of potentials for a special class of costs on $\mathbb{R}^2$. We illustrate our discussion and results with several examples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".