MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414977739 · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114278

Design database development and comparative performance assessment of connections in cross-laminated timber construction

2025· article· en· W4414977739 on OpenAlexafffund
Amirhossein Heidari, Emily Dang, Aryan Rezaei Rad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Building Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsHudbay Minerals (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TorontoCement Association of Canada
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)FastenerDesign methodsRange (aeronautics)Cross laminated timberDevelopment (topology)Shear strength (soil)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing adoption of mass timber construction, along with the variety of building products, such as cross-laminated timber (CLT), calls for a comprehensive structural performance assessment for sustainability-based design purposes. On the other hand, the vast variety of mechanical joinery types necessitates a detailed and systematic understanding of connection mechanics. This investigation develops a comprehensive database of connections for mass CLT components, serving as a dynamic “dictionary” that could inform designers with optimal design scenarios. The database has collected, aggregated, and post-processed data related to mechanical performance from 522 sets of state-of-the-art connections used in mass timber construction practice and research worldwide, including 2048 associated test specimens. The database is utilized to systematically assess the performance of a credible range of commercially available timber joinery products, along with those developed through research and development in mass timber construction. The mechanical performance of the collected data is assessed through qualitative and quantitative metrics based on assembly, joinery, and fastener types under tensile and shear loading. The database is designed to be expandable and adaptable for a wide range of applications, enabling further exploration of the structural behavior of panelized mass timber systems. It also serves as a framework for developing and implementing performance-based, analytics-driven design methodologies. • Developed a comprehensive open-source database for CLT connection performance. • Analyzed 522 group sets and 2048 test specimens for structural performance insights. • Identified high-performing alternatives to conventional CLT shear wall connections. • Assessed qualitative and quantitative mechanical behavior of CLT joinery types. • Explored digital fabrication techniques to enhance CLT connection efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Building EngineeringSame topicWood Treatment and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207