MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414978044 · doi:10.1353/his.2025.a971519

Rescuing the National Body? The Role and Imaginary of Maritime Lifesaving in the Nazi State

2025· article· en· W4414978044 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lukas Schemper

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNazismGermanThe ImaginaryContext (archaeology)NationalityState (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Rettung Schiffbrüchiger (DGzRS) is a German maritime rescue organization founded in 1865 and based on humanitarian principles to save shipwrecked persons regardless of nationality or other characteristics. Rather than stagnating or being disbanded during the Nazi period, the society expanded significantly, with a sharp increase in membership. It branded itself—visually and semantically—as a Nazi organization. Analysis of historical publications of the DGzRS and holdings in the German federal archives reveals how a humanitarian organization like the DGzRS could thrive under a fascist regime. This development was made possible because maritime lifesaving not only served a certain function for the Nazi state, which was amplified within the context of the Second World War, but also because idioms of rescue resonated with the social imaginaries of both humanitarianism and Nazism. Abstract: La Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Rettung Schiffbrüchiger (DGzRS) est une organisation allemande de sauvetage maritime fondée en 1865 et basée sur des principes humanitaires pour sauver les naufragés sans distinction de nationalité ou d’autres caractéristiques. Au lieu de stagner ou d’être dissoute pendant la période nazie, la société s’est développée de manière considérable, avec une forte augmentation du nombre de ses membres. Elle se présentait — visuellement et sémantiquement — comme une organisation nazie. L’analyse des publications historiques de la DGzRS et des fonds provenant des archives fédérales allemandes montre comment une organisation humanitaire comme la DGzRS a pu prospérer sous un régime fasciste. Une telle évolution fut rendue possible non seulement parce que le sauvetage maritime remplissait une certaine fonction pour l’État nazi, amplifiée dans le contexte de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, mais aussi parce que les idiomes liés au sauvetage entraient en résonance avec les imaginaires sociaux de l’humanitarisme et du nazisme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.037
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, ChristianityFrench-language works237,207