Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The public played a constitutive role in the establishment of lifeboat institutions during the nineteenth century. August von Kotzebue’s drama Das Strandrecht (The law of wreck; 1808), William Hillary’s An Appeal to the British Nation, on the Humanity and Policy of Forming a National Institution, for the Preservation of Lives and Property from Shipwreck (1823), and similar appeals preceding the establishment of the German Society for the Rescue of Lives from Shipwrecks (Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Rettung Schiffbrüchiger) in 1865 demonstrate the role the threat of damage to the national image played in the absence of rescue efforts. Concurrently, the portrayal of the rescuer was popularized within the context of an aesthetic of the sublime, which may also have engendered conflicts with state interests. Abstract: Le public a joué un rôle déterminant dans la création d’institutions de sauvetage au cours du XIXe siècle. Le drame d’August von Kotzebue, Das Strandrecht (La loi de l’épave; 1808), le texte de William Hillary, An Appeal to the British Nation, on the Humanity and Policy of Forming a National Institution, for the Preservation of Lives and Property from Shipwreck (1823), et d’autres appels similaires précédant la création de la Société allemande de sauvetage des naufragés (Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Rettung Schiffbrüchiger) en 1865, démontrent le rôle joué par la menace d’une atteinte à l’image nationale en l’absence d’efforts de sauvetage. En parallèle, la représentation du sauveteur a été popularisée dans le cadre d’une esthétique du sublime, ce qui a pu engendrer des conflits avec les intérêts de l’État.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".