Exploring Children’s Experiences in Circus Club
Bibliographic record
Abstract
College of Kinesiology Research Theme: Child and youth health and development Introduction. As children spend the majority of their weekdays at school, it is important that there are a wide variety of movement opportunities that align with their broad interests. In an encouraging shift from sport-centered offerings that often dominate school physical activity programming, circus arts is an increasingly popular movement option in physical education and recess/afterschool contexts. Circus has been found to be an optimal way to develop physical literacy and the introduction of circus arts programs in schools has resulted in increased physical literacy outcomes for children and youth. Additionally, student voices are essential in shaping understanding of movement opportunities, furthering a deeper sense of ownership, confidence, and motivation in their physical literacy development. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to understand the physical literacy experiences of elementary school children who participated in circus club. Methods. Circus club is a lunch-time program at an elementary school in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. The program is run by a physical education specialist, and it strives to provide students from grades 3-8 a non-sport movement opportunity. An intrinsic case study method was used to gain an in-depth understanding of the participants' experiences in circus club. Three data collection tools were used: field notes on participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and the write, draw, show, and tell (WDST) method. Data analysis was done by using Braun and Clarke’s six step reflexive thematic analysis. Results. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 students enrolled in grades 4-8, and four completed the optional WDST activity. Using Braun and Clarke’s (2022) reflexive thematic analysis procedures, three themes were identified: (i) “I know I am getting better”: Enhanced confidence and motivation through challenge, (ii) “Learning together”: Collaboration and social engagement opportunities, and (iii) “Just be creative”: Empowerment through choice and creative freedom. The findings highlighted how physical challenge, collaboration, choice, and creative freedom enhanced the participants’ confidence, motivation, and social engagement. Conclusion. Circus arts provided a unique opportunity for students to develop various aspects of physical literacy including confidence and competence, shown through positive challenge, as well as motivation, social connection, and creativity. The study also illuminated valuable insights into the participants’ perspectives, highlighting the importance of their experiences in shaping their understanding and engagement with physical activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".