MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414982398 · doi:10.1177/08903344251369419

A Descriptive Qualitative Study of Breastfeeding Challenges, Enablers and Confidence Among Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

2025· article· en· W4414982398 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sonia Semenic, Sonia Angela Castiglione, Carla Benea, Deborah Da Costa, Natalie Dayan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Human Lactation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersHeart And Stroke Foundation Of Quebec
KeywordsBreastfeedingPregnancyQualitative researchConfidence intervalLactationBreast feedingDescriptive research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are at a significantly increased risk for chronic hypertension and premature cardiovascular disease. Although breastfeeding may have cardiovascular benefits, those with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy tend to have lower rates of breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity. A deeper understanding of their breastfeeding experiences is necessary to inform effective interventions that support lactation. RESEARCH AIM: This study aimed to explore breastfeeding challenges, enablers, and factors influencing breastfeeding confidence among individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. METHOD: This study employs a descriptive, qualitative approach. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted between 2 and 8 months postpartum with a convenience sub-sample of 18 individuals enrolled in a pilot randomized controlled trial of a breastfeeding support intervention in Quebec, Canada. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Data were coded and grouped under three categories related to the main interview questions (breastfeeding challenges, enablers, and factors influencing breastfeeding confidence). RESULTS: Perinatal complications, struggles with milk supply, high rates of formula supplementation, and lack of consistent or skilled breastfeeding support challenged early breastfeeding experiences. Breastfeeding enablers included hands-on support with feedings, accessible breastfeeding information and support, and being determined to breastfeed. Discouragement to breastfeed from family or health professionals diminished breastfeeding confidence whereas learning from the breastfeeding experiences of others and positive reinforcement for breastfeeding efforts helped build breastfeeding confidence. CONCLUSIONS: Skilled, proactive lactation support targeting breastfeeding confidence may help optimize breastfeeding outcomes among individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, potentially mitigating their longer-term cardiovascular risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Human LactationSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207