MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414986078 · doi:10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf094

Elevated 7-Hydroxymitragynine Levels Found in Products Misbranded as Kratom

2025· article· en· W4414986078 on OpenAlexafffund
Paula N. Brown, Michael Chan, Xiaohui Zhang, Thomas Brendler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of AOAC International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBacteriaFolk medicineSoutheast asia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The leaves of Mitragyna speciosa, commonly called kratom, have been consumed for centuries for their energizing and analgesic properties. Kratom has gained popularity in North America, with an estimated 16 million American consumers. Recently, a new product has emerged, labeled "kratom extract" but purportedly composed of high concentrations of 7-hydroxymitragynine, an oxidation product of mitragynine, the primary alkaloid found in kratom. OBJECTIVE: 7-hydroxymitragynine, a potent mu-agonist, may pose a serious public health risk. Commercial products labeled as containing 7-hydroxymitragynine were evaluated to determine whether the constituent was present and in what concentration. METHOD: The concentrations of 7-hydroxymitragynine and mitragynine were determined by a previously validated HPLC-DAD method, AOAC Official MethodSM 2017.14. The chromatographic profiles of products were also compared to authentic kratom leaf. RESULTS: All products were described on their label as containing "kratom extracts." The concentration of mitragynine ranged from 2.0 to 6.0 mg/g dry weight, substantially lower than typically found in kratom leaves or extracts. 7-hydroxymitragynine was determined at 22-75 mg/g dry weight, 5-28% higher than the label claims. The chromatographic profiles of all products were inconsistent with kratom leaf, having exceptional levels of 7-hydroxymitragynine, lacking the other major naturally occurring alkaloids, and exhibiting peaks not observed in leaf. CONCLUSIONS: The products were verified to contain very high levels of 7-hydroxymitragynine, achievable only by synthetic means. These products differ significantly from authentic native kratom leaf and are not kratom extracts, as labeled, but rather synthetic derivatives that constitute unapproved new drugs being unlawfully marketed. There is an urgent need to differentiate kratom, which has been safely consumed for centuries, from 7-hydroxymitragynine, which may pose a significant risk to public health. HIGHLIGHTS: Traditional kratom leaf is distinguished from products found to contain high concentrations of 7-hydroxymitragynine, only achievable by synthetic means. These unapproved new drugs contained other unidentified constituents, also not present in the native kratom leaf. The presence of concentrated 7-hydroxymitragynine products in the market masquerading as kratom is misleading, unlawful, and potentially dangerous to the public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AOAC InternationalSame topicAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacologyFrench-language works237,207