A Group Imported from Acemhöyük: Black-Glazed Pottery from the Hellenistic Period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this first study on the Hellenistic period culture of Acemhöyük, the Black Glazed Pottery among the imported pottery of the settlement were evaluated. This article, the Black Glazed Pottery were dated, introduced to the scientific world and the socio-economic structure of Acemhöyük in that period and the relations between the regions were tried to be understood. In this study, the Black Glazed Pottery found at Acemhöyük has been dated and introduced to the scientific world, and an attempt has been made to understand the socio-economic structure of Acemhöyük during that period as well as its interregional interactions. The Acemhöyük samples in the form of kantharoi and bowls were dated to the last quarter of the 4th century BC and the 3rd century BC. Their production characteristics suggest that they were produced in West Anatolia/North Ionia. This information reveals that Acemhöyük had direct or indirect relations with Western Anatolia at the mentioned date and that Acemhöyük had a place in the regional trade network in the 3rd century BC. These data have demonstrated that Acemhöyük established direct or indirect relations with Western Anatolia in the 3rd century BC and that it was part of the regional trade network during this period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".