MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Northern wildfire resiliency initiative:

2019· article· en· W4414991122 on OpenAlexaffabout
Evelyn Hope Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueBiodiversidade Brasileira · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsSmiths Detection (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipGovernment (linguistics)Resilience (materials science)Wildfire suppressionClimate changeLocal governmentPsychological resilienceFire protectionClimate resilience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

British Columbia, Canada just experienced two of the worst wildfire seasons in recent history - with climate conditions conducive to more severe fires forecast. This has led to a growing awareness by government of the need for a radically new approach to land management to protect resources and people. The goal of the Northern Wildfire Resilience Initiative (NWRI), led by the Bulkley Valley Research Centre (BVRC), is to facilitate forest and fire management paradigm shifts required to develop forest and community wildfire resilience. Key elements include partnerships, practices, policies and planning. The NWRI is an umbrella for many initiatives and projects. In April 2019, with strong support and funding from government and industry, the BVRC brought together over 160 people from local, regional and provincial governments, First Nations, local communities, NGOs, and tenure holders including large forest industry to develop a collaborative approach to reducing the risks of wildfires. A regional pilot project was developed - based on an analysis of the historic fire regimes, predicted climate change and current conditions. The outcome is an integrated approach that places priority on wildfire management activities, including timber harvesting and reforestation, that enhance wildfire resiliency. Fire management actions focus on actions that help return the forests to a state similar that found prior to extensive fire suppression. This includes determining when and where to allow wildfires to burn, building strategic fire guards and increased use of prescribed fire. The BVRC, in partnership with universities and other research agencies, provides scientific expertise and leads research project designed to ensure a science-based approach to the pilot project. Collaborations include projects to determine historic fire regimes - including the structure and composition at various scales, effectiveness of treatments such as prescribed fire in reducing forest flammability, meta-analysis of the effects of fire on ecosystem elements, and a study of the obstacles to making needed changes. The BVRC also provides extension services and hosts a variety of social media platforms, workshops and webinars and produces written material for the and practitioners to support the NWRI. Â

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.070

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiodiversidade BrasileiraSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207