MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414994207 · doi:10.1093/ornithapp/duaf062

Marketing birds: The traits birdwatching tourism companies highlight in Costa Rican tour itineraries

2025· article· en· W4414994207 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel S. Karp, Katherine S. Lauck, D Julian Tattoni, Alejandra Echeverri

Bibliographic record

VenueOrnithological applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersUniversity of California, DavisCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTourismIUCN Red ListBiodiversityValue (mathematics)NoveltyFlagship speciesEcotourismService (business)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Birdwatching tourism has blossomed into a profitable industry, promoting peoples’ connections to nature and contributing billions of dollars to local economies annually. Understanding which species birdwatchers value and why could help distinguish flagship species for ecotourism and conservation marketing. Here, we draw from ecological, psychological, and economic perspectives to test hypotheses about which species’ attributes (i.e., traits) are most prevalent among birds marketed to birdwatchers. To do so, we implemented a multi-year course-based undergraduate research experience to quantify how often >750 bird species appeared in >150 itineraries describing tours traversing Costa Rica. We then associated itinerary mentions with data on species’ appearances, vocalizations, distributions, conservation statuses, and behaviors. We found that larger, more attractive species appeared frequently in trip itineraries, but species with pleasing vocalizations did not. We also found that range-restricted species appeared 10 times more frequently in trip itineraries than cosmopolitan species. Species with tropical distributions that rarely associate with humans were also more frequently mentioned, suggesting that companies recognize the high value dedicated birdwatchers place on novel species. Surprisingly, IUCN status was not associated with itinerary scores, and commonly encountered species were more likely to be mentioned in trip itineraries than rarely encountered species. These findings suggest tour companies may balance species’ perceived novelty to birdwatchers against the likelihood that they can “deliver” them to their clients. Our findings broadly contribute to a deeper understanding of how human preferences shape interactions with biodiversity and may help bridge the gap between cultural ecosystem services and conservation strategies. Insights into which traits drive birdwatcher preferences could help conservation practitioners and tour operators identify species potentially at risk from unregulated birdwatching tourism as well as species that could be used as flagships to motivate ecotourism and conservation actions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrnithological applicationsSame topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207