Sexual health indicators among young adults living with perinatally-acquired HIV in france, a gender-stratified comparison with their peers in the general population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive understanding of sexual health among young adults living with perinatally-acquired HIV (PHIV) is needed. We compared sexual health indicators among PHIV adults aged 18 to 25 and their peers in France, using a gender-stratified analysis. METHODS: Data were drawn from baseline questionnaires of 284 PHIV participants in the ANRS-COVERTE-CO19 cohort, enrolled from 2010 to 2015, and from the Baromètre Santé surveys (BS), nationally representative cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2010 and 2016 (BS10 N = 2,899 and BS16 N = 1,633 respectively). For each sexual health indicator, standardized rates among PHIV participants were compared with the pooled weighted rates for their peers from the general population. Where indicators differed, logistic regression was performed to assess associations between these indicators and three HIV-specific variables. Analyses were carried out separately by gender. RESULTS: PHIV participants showed similar results for current romantic relationship, previous sexual experiences, same-sex sexual partners, age at first intercourse, and condom use at first sexual intercourse were also similar. Prevalence for use of means to avoid pregnancy was lower among PHIV participants of both genders. PHIV women were less likely to report a satisfactory sex life (86% vs. 94%) and more likely to report voluntary abortion (16% vs. 12%). HIV disclosure was associated with a higher likelihood of reporting current romantic relationship in women (aOR 4.40 [1.94-9.95]) and satisfactory sex life in men (aOR 4.68 [1.29-17.04]). CONCLUSIONS: PHIV participants demonstrated similar results regarding most of the sexual health outcomes. However, PHIV women reported less sex life satisfaction and more voluntary abortion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The COVERTE study received approval from the CPP III (n°2738). For the BS surveys, the CNIL approved each survey (n°915589).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".