INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING FOR COMMUNITY-BASED AGROTOURISM DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION IN JAYAWIJAYA REGENCY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jayawijaya Regency holds significant potential for developing agro-tourism villages based on local wisdom and environmental conservation. However, underdeveloped community institutions remain a key barrier. This community service project aimed to strengthen village institutions through agro-tourism management training, participatory planning facilitation, and digital promotion. The participatory method was implemented over three days at Yudha Hall and organized by the Department of Culture and Tourism of Jayawijaya Regency, involving approximately 45 local tourism actors. Results indicated a significant improvement in participants' understanding of agro-tourism concepts, institutional strengthening (BUMDes and Pokdarwis), and the emergence of participatory village tourism action plans. Before the training, only 27% of participants understood basic agro-tourism concepts; this increased to 81% post-training. These achievements demonstrate that thematic training integrated with field practice is effective in building institutional capacity and advancing sustainable agro-tourism development in Jayawijaya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".