MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415003064 · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2025.3620014

Real-Time Energy Management Based on Proximal Policy Optimization With Mask Layer for Hybrid Electric Mining Trucks

2025· article· en· W4415003064 on OpenAlexaff
Xinxin Zhao, Nasser L. Azad, M. Farsi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersChongqing UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEnergy managementDynamic programmingMinificationTruckEnergy (signal processing)GeneralizationFunction (biology)Energy consumptionState of charge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An effective energy management strategy (EMS) is crucial to improve the energy efficiency of hybrid vehicles, especially for heavy-duty mining trucks. An energy management strategy based on a proximal policy optimization algorithm with mask layer and novel reward functions (PPO-MASK-NR) is proposed for hybrid electric mining trucks (HEMTs) with multi-planetary systems. This algorithm fundamentally avoids irrational exploration by an intelligent agent by incorporating a real-time mask layer, and it accelerates learning efficiency by suppressing the backward propagation of gradients for irrational actions. A universally designed reward function is applied to ensure the achievement of the correct final state of charge (SOC) value and the expansion of the SOC's exploration range. Finally, the generalization performance of the proposed algorithm is validated through new driving cycles, and its authenticity is confirmed through hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) testing. The simulation results show that within the selected training cycles, the proposed algorithm achieves 98% compared with the dynamic programming algorithm (DP). The proposed algorithm has an improvement of 11% and 5% in online applications for a new driving cycle compared to a rule-based technique (RB) and the equivalent fuel consumption minimization approach (ECMS), respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Vehicular TechnologySame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207