Efficient 6-GHz Wi-Fi-Based Occupancy Detection: Channel Model-Informed Feature Engineering and Random Forest Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the use of the newly opened, and relatively unexplored, 6 GHz band for office occupancy detection using Wi-Fi sensing. To deliver accurate and efficient occupancy detection, we develop a novel channel model-informed feature engineering method combined with a random forest optimization strategy. Specifically, physically interpretable channel state information (CSI) amplitude-based features, such as the Rician <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i>-factor and channel coherence time, are employed to capture channel variations induced by human presence and movement. A dual sliding window approach is introduced to effectively extract temporally relevant channel parameters, significantly improving computational efficiency and classification accuracy. Experimental validation conducted in a realistic office environment demonstrates that the proposed method achieves an average occupancy classification accuracy of 98.28%, outperforming existing methods while substantially reducing computational complexity. These findings suggest that integrating this Wi-Fi sensing approach into next-generation networks (e.g., IEEE 802.11bf) can enhance real-time responsiveness and reliability in smart building applications such as security and energy management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".