MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415005677 · doi:10.1370/afm.23.s1.8168

Exploring the Role of Nurse Navigators as System Navigators in Primary Care

2025· article· en· W4415005677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mona Emam, Jennifer Shuldiner, Noah Ivers, Jaclyn Martyn, Catherine Hansen, Jennifer Davis, Kylie Gabatin, Tamara Raines, Jocelyn Charle, Pauline Pariser

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus groupScope (computer science)Health careScope of practiceQualitative researchPrimary careQualitative propertyPrimary health care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Context</h3> Much of primary care in Ontario, Canada is delivered by small practices unaffiliated with teams, resulting in inequities in access to healthcare resources. The Seamless Care Optimizing the Patient Experience (SCOPE) program supports solo Primary Care Clinicians (PCC) by integrating nurse navigators who facilitate referrals, bridge regional healthcare resources, and improve care coordination. <h3>Objective</h3> This study explored the roles and collaborative practices of SCOPE nurse navigators across the program’s participating sites, emphasizing how collaboration supports care delivery. <h3>Study Design and Analysis</h3> A multi-method design included an online survey and two focus groups. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while focus group data were thematically analyzed using a qualitative descriptive methodology. <h3>Setting or Dataset</h3> The study was conducted across all SCOPE program sites in Ontario where nurse navigators were employed. <h3>Population studied</h3> Sixteen SCOPE nurse navigators were invited to participate; twelve participated in the surveys and focus groups. <h3>Intervention/instrument</h3> The survey explored nurse navigators’ roles, clinical background, and job satisfaction. Focus groups explored collaborative practices, barriers to cross-site communication, and examples of shared problem-solving across SCOPE sites. <h3>Outcome Measures</h3> Measures included self-reported job satisfaction, frequency and method of cross-site communication, and qualitative themes related to collaboration and system navigation. <h3>Results</h3> Participants reported diverse clinical backgrounds and high job satisfaction. They maintained regular contact with colleagues using virtual tools and bi-monthly meetings to expedite referrals and share resources. Four key themes emerged: 1) supporting underserved communities by bringing in resources, 2) connecting PCCs and specialists living in different regions, 3) bridging resources between regions, and 4) ensuring timely care for vulnerable patients alleviate emergency department strain. <h3>Conclusions</h3> SCOPE nurse navigators enhance care coordination and reduce disparities by collaborating across sites. Their collaboration and resource sharing improve care access and outcomes. This study highlights how non-physician team members can extend primary care capacity, support clinicians, and deliver more equitable care. Expanding similar integrated care models may strengthen primary care for underserved populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationFrench-language works237,207