MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415005677 · doi:10.1370/afm.23.s1.8168

Exploring the Role of Nurse Navigators as System Navigators in Primary Care

2025· article· en· W4415005677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mona Emam, Jennifer Shuldiner, Noah Ivers, Jaclyn Martyn, Catherine Hansen, Jennifer Davis, Kylie Gabatin, Tamara Raines, Jocelyn Charle, Pauline Pariser

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus groupScope (computer science)Health careScope of practiceQualitative researchPrimary careQualitative propertyPrimary health care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context Much of primary care in Ontario, Canada is delivered by small practices unaffiliated with teams, resulting in inequities in access to healthcare resources. The Seamless Care Optimizing the Patient Experience (SCOPE) program supports solo Primary Care Clinicians (PCC) by integrating nurse navigators who facilitate referrals, bridge regional healthcare resources, and improve care coordination. Objective This study explored the roles and collaborative practices of SCOPE nurse navigators across the program’s participating sites, emphasizing how collaboration supports care delivery. Study Design and Analysis A multi-method design included an online survey and two focus groups. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while focus group data were thematically analyzed using a qualitative descriptive methodology. Setting or Dataset The study was conducted across all SCOPE program sites in Ontario where nurse navigators were employed. Population studied Sixteen SCOPE nurse navigators were invited to participate; twelve participated in the surveys and focus groups. Intervention/instrument The survey explored nurse navigators’ roles, clinical background, and job satisfaction. Focus groups explored collaborative practices, barriers to cross-site communication, and examples of shared problem-solving across SCOPE sites. Outcome Measures Measures included self-reported job satisfaction, frequency and method of cross-site communication, and qualitative themes related to collaboration and system navigation. Results Participants reported diverse clinical backgrounds and high job satisfaction. They maintained regular contact with colleagues using virtual tools and bi-monthly meetings to expedite referrals and share resources. Four key themes emerged: 1) supporting underserved communities by bringing in resources, 2) connecting PCCs and specialists living in different regions, 3) bridging resources between regions, and 4) ensuring timely care for vulnerable patients alleviate emergency department strain. Conclusions SCOPE nurse navigators enhance care coordination and reduce disparities by collaborating across sites. Their collaboration and resource sharing improve care access and outcomes. This study highlights how non-physician team members can extend primary care capacity, support clinicians, and deliver more equitable care. Expanding similar integrated care models may strengthen primary care for underserved populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationFrench-language works237,207