Turning (and tuning in) to rural media: Exploring the role of identity, place, and participation in locating community radio
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Community Radio (CR) acts as a critical platform for fostering participation and cultural identity, especially in marginalized and rural contexts. The article proposes a conceptual framework for analyzing rural communication through an analysis of the activities of Radio Dhimsa, a community radio broadcaster in Eastern India. It critiques the tendency to treat ‘rural’ as a passive backdrop, advocating for a deeper understanding of the interplay between media, place, and rurality. By analyzing the cultural, administrative, and material dimensions of CR, the study highlights its multifaceted impact on content production and dissemination. Drawing on ethnographic and qualitative methods, including participant observation, interviews, and focus group discussions, and employing constructive interpretive grounded theory, the findings reveal Radio Dhimsa’s critical role in cultural preservation, local empowerment, and amplifying marginalized voices. Broadcasting in the Desia (Indigenous) dialect, the station fosters belonging and counters socio-political marginalization while navigating the challenges posed by physical geography and climatic conditions. This research contributes to emerging scholarship on rural communication by engaging with both material and cultural dimensions of CR. It underscores the transformative potential of community radio as a tool for participatory communication and cultural preservation, advocating for media studies that reflect the complexities of rural identities and socio-cultural dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".