MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415015856 · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2025.110682

Impact of innate immune factors on the persistence of Staphylococcus aureus in the ocular environment

2025· article· en· W4415015856 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michelle C. Callegan, Luis Longoria-Gonzalez, Roger Astley, Phillip S. Coburn

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Eye Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Eye InstituteNational Institutes of HealthMedical Council of CanadaResearch to Prevent Blindness
KeywordsStaphylococcus aureusProinflammatory cytokineInnate immune systemInflammationKeratitisStaphylococcal infectionsTLR2Immune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbial keratitis can be detrimental to vision, causing corneal damage and inflammation that can lead to painful epithelial defects and scarring. Staphylococcus aureus is frequently isolated from bacterial keratitis cases. This organism's virulome and propensity for antibiotic resistance make it a formidable ocular pathogen that is often difficult to eradicate. S. aureus is not typically isolated from an immunocompetent ocular environment. We therefore hypothesized that elements of innate immunity are important in protecting the cornea from S. aureus infection, so their absence would facilitate persistence that might lead to keratitis. In the current study, we used a corneal scratch and topical inoculation model with S. aureus strain 8325-4 to infect mouse eyes and assess infection and inflammation in wild type C57BL/6J mice and mice genetically deficient in TLR2 (i.e. TLR2-/- or TLR2/4-/-) or TLR2-associated proinflammatory mediators (CXCL1-/-, CXCL2-/-, CXCL10-/-, CCL2-/-, CCL3-/-, or TNFα-/-). We included males and females in these experiments to determine whether sex was a biological variable. We assessed staphylococcal burden and clearance by quantifying colony forming units (CFU)/eye, inflammation by quantifying myeloperoxidase (MPO) from infiltrating neutrophils, and ocular pathology each day for 3-6 days, depending on the assay. Our data shows that, in general, the absence of the TLR2 pathway and its downstream mediators facilitated persistence of S. aureus in the mouse eye, but did not lead to ulcerative keratitis. S. aureus was cleared from the C57BL/6J mouse cornea within 3 days, while the organism persisted in knockout mouse eyes through day 6. Although pockets of staphylococci and neutrophil influx at the sites of infection were observed in some eyes, there were surprisingly very few corneal epithelial defects noted irrespective of mouse strain. These results suggest that defects in innate immunity create an environment that can facilitate persistence of S. aureus at the ocular surface, an area typically devoid of harmful bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental Eye ResearchSame topicOcular Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207