Estrogen-related receptor gene expression associates with sex differences in cortical atrophy in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder, characterized by dream-enacting movements during REM sleep, is a male-predominant parasomnia and the strongest prodromal marker of synucleinopathies. Individuals with this disorder show cortical atrophy whose regional distribution covaries with gene expression patterns measured in the healthy human brain. However, the effect of sex on these brain changes remains unknown. The study objective is to comprehensively assess sex differences in cortical morphology and to characterize the healthy-brain gene expression correlates of brain abnormalities using the largest international multicentric MRI dataset of polysomnography-confirmed patients. Males have significantly more extensive and severe cortical thinning compared to females, despite similar age and clinical features. Imaging transcriptomics analyses indicate that regions affected in female patients map onto areas with higher expression of estrogen-related receptor genes, particularly ESRRG and ESRRA, in the healthy brain. These findings support potential sex-specific neuroprotection in the prodromal stages of synucleinopathies and may inform personalized and targeted therapeutic strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".