MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415038688 · doi:10.1785/0220250211

High-Precision Detection of Clock Errors in Seismograms from the Ordos Block Using Multicomponent Noise Cross Correlations

2025· article· en· W4415038688 on OpenAlexaff
Cong Zhou, Meng Zhang, Xiaoshu Li, Kexu Shi, Qingliang Wang, Xiangzhi Zeng

Bibliographic record

VenueSeismological Research Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismogramWaveformStandard deviationRange (aeronautics)Block (permutation group theory)Noise (video)Robustness (evolution)Ambient noise level

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The accuracy of absolute timing in seismic records is critical for applications such as earthquake location, seismic tomography, and earthquake early warning. This study develops and applies a high-precision method for detecting clock errors based on continuous three-component waveform data recorded from 2019 to 2023 at 188 permanent seismic stations in and around the Ordos block. The method combines multicomponent ambient noise cross correlation and weighted stacking to estimate daily clock errors by analyzing the symmetry deviation of cross-correlation functions. Constraining each station’s drift estimate with multiple neighboring pairs through weighted averaging improves the stability and robustness of the detection, making it well suited for monitoring of large-scale seismic networks. The results show that: (1) A total of 72 stations (38.3%) exhibited significant clock drift over the 5-year period, with an average annual anomaly rate of ∼11.6%; some stations experienced clock drift for over 10 months in a single year. (2) The maximum drift exceeded ±10 s, whereas drifts larger than ∼0.5 s can be detected and validated, typically using teleseismic events. The anomalous stations were spatially dispersed, indicating that the drift was primarily caused by station-specific issues rather than regional environmental interference. (3) The types of clock drift observed include linear, nonlinear, abrupt, and compound patterns, reflecting a range of instrumental failures or environmental factors. In addition, validation using an adjacent-teleseism double-differential timing method successfully identified a subtle drift of ∼0.2 s at station SX.LOF, demonstrating the method’s potential sub-second sensitivity, though such detections near the threshold are less stable. This study establishes a 5-year database of clock errors for seismic stations in the Ordos region, providing essential data support for seismological applications and offering a methodological reference for quality control in large seismic networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeismological Research LettersSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207