Transcatheter correction of the scimitar variant with dual pulmonary venous drainage—an international multicentre series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scimitar syndrome is an uncommon congenital malformation of pulmonary venous drainage to the junction of the right atrium and inferior caval vein. Treatment is usually surgical, depending on the morphological variant. When there is dual drainage of the anomalous veins to the inferior caval vein and the left atrium, a transcatheter procedure may represent an alternative to surgery. METHODS: We report a series of four patients with the scimitar variant with dual pulmonary venous drainage treated with a transcatheter approach. RESULT: All four patients (three children, one adult) had dual drainage of right pulmonary veins into the inferior caval vein and to the left atrium via a connecting vein. All patients underwent a successful catheter occlusion of the anomalous connection to the systemic vein without complication. Vascular plug devices were used in two patients: a left atrial appendage closure device in one patient and a ventricular septal defect closure device in one patient. All the procedures resulted in complete occlusion of the anomalous venous drainage to the inferior caval vein and unobstructed drainage to the left atrium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".