Robust valuation and optimal harvesting of forestry resources in the presence of catastrophe risk and parameter uncertainty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We determine forest lease value and optimal harvesting strategies under model parameter uncertainty within stochastic bio-economic models that account for catastrophe risk. Catastrophic events are modeled as a Poisson point process, with a two-factor stochastic convenience yield model capturing the lumber spot price dynamics. Using lumber futures and US wildfire data, we estimate model parameters through Kalman filtering and maximum likelihood estimation and specify the model parameter uncertainty set as the 95% confidence region. We numerically determine the forest lease value under catastrophe risk and parameter uncertainty using reflected backward stochastic differential equations (RBSDEs) and establish conservative and optimistic bounds for lease values and optimal stopping boundaries for harvesting. Numerical experiments further explore how parameter uncertainty, catastrophe intensity, and carbon sequestration impact the lease valuation and harvesting decision. In particular, we explore the costs arising from this form of uncertainty in the form of a reduction of the lease value. These are implicit costs which can be attributed to climate risk, and are likely to become more significant as forestry resources play a larger role in the energy transition. We conclude that in the presence of parameter uncertainty, it is better to lean toward a conservative strategy reflecting, to some extent, the worst case than being overly optimistic. Moreover, our results suggest that convenience yield plays a substantial role in determining optimal harvesting strategies within the two-factor model adopted in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".