MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415052787 · doi:10.2196/76553

Conversational Artificial Intelligence for Integrating Social Determinants, Genomics, and Clinical Data in Precision Medicine: Development and Implementation Study of the AI-HOPE-PM System

2025· article· en· W4415052787 on OpenAlex
Ei-Wen Yang, Brigette Waldrup, Enrique Velazquez‐Villarreal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowScalabilityData collectionKey (lock)Work (physics)Development (topology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Integrating clinical, genomic, and social determinants of health (SDOH) data is essential for advancing precision medicine and addressing cancer health disparities. However, existing bioinformatics tools often lack the flexibility to perform equity-driven analyses or require significant programming expertise. Objective: We developed AI-HOPE-PM (Artificial Intelligence Agent for High-Optimization and Precision Medicine in Population Metrics), a conversational artificial intelligence system designed to enable natural language-driven, multidimensional cancer analysis. This study describes the development, implementation, and application of AI-HOPE-PM to support hypothesis testing that integrates genomic, clinical, and SDOH data. Methods: AI-HOPE-PM leverages large language models and Python-based statistical scripts to convert user-defined natural language queries into executable workflows. It was evaluated using curated colorectal cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and cBioPortal, enriched with harmonized SDOH variables. Accuracy of natural language interpretation, run time efficiency, and usability were benchmarked against cBioPortal and UCSC Xena. Results: AI-HOPE-PM successfully supported case-control stratification, survival modeling, and odds ratio analysis using natural language prompts. In colorectal cancer case studies, the system revealed significant disparities in progression-free survival and treatment access based on financial strain, health care access, food insecurity, and social support, demonstrating the importance of integrating SDOH in cancer research. Benchmark testing showed faster task execution compared to existing platforms, and the system achieved 92.5% accuracy in parsing biomedical queries. Conclusions: AI-HOPE-PM lowers technical barriers to integrative cancer research by enabling real-time, user-friendly exploration of clinical, genomic, and SDOH data. It expands on prior work by incorporating equity metrics into precision oncology workflows and offers a scalable tool for supporting disparities-focused translational research. Five videos are included as multimedia appendices to demonstrate platform functionality in real-world scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it