Population-wide introduction of dose-adjusted EPOCH-R in high-grade B-cell lymphoma with <i>MYC</i> / <i>BCL2</i> rearrangements, DLBCL morphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: High-grade B-cell lymphoma with "double-hit" MYC and BCL2 rearrangements (HGBCL-DH-BCL2) is associated with poor outcomes following standard chemoimmunotherapy, prompting dose-intensive regimen use. However, the benefit of intensification is unclear due to rarity precluding randomized trials, and selection bias in retrospective comparisons. In 2015, BC Cancer introduced a provincial guideline recommending dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) for fit patients aged ≤75 years with HGBCL-DH-BCL2 identified by routine cytogenetic testing. To assess this guideline's impact, we compared the outcomes of patients with de novo HGBCL-DH-BCL2 tumors of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) morphology across 2 eras. The DA-EPOCH-R era (2015-2020) included patients diagnosed after guideline implementation. The historic era (2005-2010) included patients identified from a historic province-wide cohort of patients with DLBCL morphology tumors that underwent universal cytogenetic testing in a research setting, predominantly treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. Two-year overall survival (OS) was significantly improved in the DA-EPOCH-R vs historic era (75% vs 47%, P = .008) in HGBCL-DH-BCL2, whereas OS remained unchanged in DLBCL, not otherwise specified (78% vs 76%, P = .17). Within HGBCL-DH-BCL2, tumors harboring immunoglobulin MYC partner loci (43%) and those expressing the dark-zone signature (77%) were associated with the most substantial survival improvements. In a contemporary cohort of HGBCL-DH-BCL2 histologically transformed from follicular lymphoma (FL) in the DA-EPOCH-R era, outcomes of patients who were chemoimmunotherapy-naïve were comparable to those with de novo disease, whereas patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy for FL prior to transformation had poor outcomes. These data support using DA-EPOCH-R in select patients with HGBCL-DH-BCL2 of DLBCL morphology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".