MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415053667 · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2025.09.042

Promoting Equity in Transplant Research by Addressing the Exclusion of Patients With Glomerular Disease

2025· article· en· W4415053667 on OpenAlexaff
Frank Hullekes, Rucháma Verhoeff, Sul A Lee, Aiko P. J. de Vries, Harald Seeger, Elias David‐Neto, Hajeong Lee, Paolo Malvezzi, Marina Loucaidou, Priya S. Verghese, Ajay Kumar Thakur, Roberto Ceratti Manfro, Gaetano La Manna, Enver Akalin, Edmund Huang, Hay Me Me, Rafael Villicana, Emilio Poggio, Hani M. Wadei, Juliana Mansur, Hélio Tedesco‐Silva, Andreas Kousios, Aileen X. Wang, Sita Gourishankar, Marilda Mazzali, Luigi Biancone, Stefan P. Berger, Mark D. Stegall, Paolo Cravedi, Leonardo V. Riella

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta Hospital
FundersCareDxMassachusetts General HospitalAstraZeneca
KeywordsKidney diseaseClinical trialDiseaseTransplantationKidney transplantationRisk stratificationNephrologyKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record.This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article.Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.513
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.542
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5130.542
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0160.019
Open science0.0050.026
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney International ReportsSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207