Genetic architecture of the developing forelegs of <i>Drosophila prolongata</i> ; an exaggerated weapon and ornament
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Extreme secondary sexual traits are some of the most striking phenotypes in nature. Studies on the genetics of these phenotypes have largely focused on within-species functional analyses of signalling pathways. Although useful, these do not provide insight into the evolutionary mechanisms that occur during the evolution of trait exaggeration. Drosophila prolongata offers an exceptional opportunity to explore the evolution of trait exaggeration, as it is the only species in the melanogaster species group with male-specific foreleg size exaggeration under both intra- and intersexual selection. Here, we used sex-specific RNA-seq from fore- and midleg tissues during early development and after initiation of sexually dimorphic growth between these tissues in D. prolongata . We also sampled the same developmental stages in D. carrolli (∼4MYA divergence) and D. melanogaster (∼20MYA). Using comparisons of gene expression between sexes, species, tissues, and developmental stages, we found a positive relationship between the number, but not the magnitude of differential expression of sex-biased genes, with the extent of phenotypic dimorphism. One gene with a large effect, grain , caused D. prolongata -like leg size phenotypes in D. melanogaster legs when knocked down. We further found only modest changes to magnitude and direction of expression differences in signalling pathways previously implicated in sexually dimorphic evolution. This suggests that these pathways regulating trait expression and dimorphism but may not be primary drivers of their phenotypic evolution. Significance statement How sexes evolve distinct forms while developing from a shared genome continues to be incompletely resolved. We explore a sexually dimorphic exaggerated trait, enlarged forelegs in Drosophila prolongata , and compare changes in sex-biased gene expression between tissues and developmental stages in D. prolongata and two closely related species without foreleg exaggeration. We show that major developmental pathways don’t appear to change substantially in their direction or magnitude of expression between species. We further show a transcription factor, grain , that when knocked-down, induces D. prolongata leg-like phenotypes in D. melanogaster at low penetrance. Our results suggest that despite large morphological differences and patterns of dimorphism, gene expression changes between the developing tissues may be more modest than previously thought.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".