Reappraising the Anatomy of the Ansa Lenticularis in the Human Brain: A Cadaveric, Focused Fiber Micro-Dissection Study Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to map the topography, morphology, connectivity, and correlative anatomy of the ansa lenticularis (AL) in the human brain since there is a paucity of direct structural evidence from cadaveric studies. METHODS: Twenty normal adult formalin-fixed cerebral hemispheres were treated with Klingler's method and subsequently explored through the fiber microdissection technique. Basal and medial dissections focusing on the anterior perforated substance, subthalamic, and mesencephalic areas were carried out in a stepwise manner. Hemispheric asymmetries were recorded, and the spatial relationship of the AL with the surrounding fiber tracts and nuclei was investigated. RESULTS: The AL and its segments were consistently identified sweeping around the cerebral peduncle in a medial direction posterior to the anterior commissure and dorsal to the optic tract and ansa peduncularis after arising from the ventral-posterior margin of the globus pallidus. Then it made an almost right angle to reach the thalamus (dorsal segment), subthalamic nucleus (dorsal segment), red nucleus (middle segment), and substantia nigra (ventral segment), respectively. Additionally, the dorsal segment of the AL intermingled with the fasciculus lenticularis (FL) at the level of the zona incerta (ZI) to form the thalamic fasciculus (H1 field of Forel), which travelled slightly lateral to the cerebellothalamic fibers, ascended through the prerubral field, and terminated in the area of the anterior and ventral thalamus. CONCLUSIONS: We provide structural evidence of the topography, morphology, and connectional anatomy of the ansa lenticularis. From our review of the literature this is the first cadaveric study using white matter microdissection to delineate the comprehensive composition of the ansa lenticularis. Fiber microdissection studies are integral for the extrapolation of accurate anatomical conclusions which subsequently inform clinical practice. Combined with tractography and histology, these studies enhance our understanding of delicate pathways that can act as surgical targets in fields such as stereotactic neurosurgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".