MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415067239 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093174

Effect of mahjong, a Chinese tiled-based game, combined with upper limb robot training on upper limb function and rehabilitation participation in Chinese stroke patients: a clinical trial protocol

2025· article· en· W4415067239 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yang Xu, Fengyi Wang, Huixin Tan, Qian Zhang, Jiabei He, Jie Zhang, Shaxin Liu, Yonghong Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpper limbClinical trialRehabilitationStroke (engine)Chronic strokeProtocol (science)Lower limb

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Stroke is the second leading cause of death and disability creating a huge economic burden annually. Robot-assisted training (RT) is a promising therapy in stroke rehabilitation, but for the elderly, traditional 'reaching objects'" tasks do not seem to create sufficient motivation, an important factor in rehabilitation, which reduces the effect of rehabilitation. Combining RT with some popular card games like mahjong, a popular tiled-based game in the Chinese elderly, is a strategy to motivate stroke survivors. Combining functional near-infrared imaging spectroscopy technique (fNIRS), the aim of this trial is to explore the effects of mahjong-based RT on stroke survivors compared with traditional RT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The three-arm, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial will allocate 18 participants in each group, traditional robot-assisted training (TRT) group, mahjong game-based upper limb robot-assisted training (MULR) group and conventional rehabilitation group. Participants in these three groups will receive 30-min physical therapy and 30-min occupational therapy 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Participants in the TRT group will receive an extra 30-min TRT, while participants in the MULR group will receive an extra 30-min MULR 5 days per week for 3 weeks. The primary outcome will be the neuromuscular function of upper limb assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity assessed at baseline and after the last treatment has been completed. Other outcomes will include cognitive function assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment, rehabilitation motivation assessed by Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale, activities of daily living assessed by Modified Barthel Index, emotion assessed by self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale) and brain neural activity assessed by fNIRS. Two-way analysis of variance, Welch's ANOVA, post hoc comparison and simple effects analyses will be used for the analysis of scale data; while generalisation linear model analysis and seed-based correlation will be used for the analysis of fNIRS data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was approved by the ethics committee of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China (reference number: 2024298). The results of this trial will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial has been registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, https://www.chictr.org.cn. The reference number is ChiCTR2400084049. The registered name is 'Effect of mahjong game-based upper limb robot training on upper limb function in stroke patients: a functional near-infrared clinical study protocol'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.415 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→