Towards design of temporary bracing for early-age unreinforced masonry walls against out-of-plane loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Temporary bracing plays a critical role in ensuring the stability of early-age masonry walls, which are highly susceptible to out-of-plane loads because of their limited strength during the construction stages. Current masonry design standards provide limited guidance on its design and implementation, particularly in Canada. The lack of standardized guidelines often leads to overly conservative or inconsistent bracing solutions, increasing costs and potential safety risks at construction sites. This study aims to address this gap by developing a comprehensive numerical framework for designing temporary bracing systems for early-age unreinforced ungrouted masonry walls. A series of finite element simulations were conducted to evaluate the structural response of masonry walls with varying dimensions, curing times, wind speeds, and temporary bracing scenarios. Based on the findings, practical design tables were developed to provide the appropriate temporary bracing configuration for various construction stages and wind conditions. The design tables maximize the stability of early-age masonry walls and minimize the risk of failure. This study provides an initial systematic step towards temporary bracing design, bridging the gap in existing standards and contributing to safer and more economical masonry construction practices in Canada and beyond. • This paper explores the efficient construction and bracing of early-age masonry. • A bracing design guideline is developed for different configurations and environments. • The maximum unbraced height of masonry during construction is determined. • Single and multiple bracing scenarios are presented, ensuring safe construction. • The proposed methodology fills a gap in current standards with data-driven guidelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".