MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415071225 · doi:10.1093/ced/llaf438

A 14-year multicentric follow-up study of atypical pemphigus variants in Italy: the VARIANT_P study

2025· article· en· W4415071225 on OpenAlexaff
Lavinia Quintarelli, Irene Bonanni, Elena Biancamaria Mariotti, Laura Atzori, Clara De Simone, Camilla Vassallo, Giovanni Di Zenzo, Stefano Caccavale, Emanuele Cozzani, Gianpiero Girolomoni, Angelo Valerio Marzano, Andrea Conti, Pamela Vezzoli, Giovanni Damiani, Vito Di Lernia, Riccardo Balestri, Roberto Maglie, Alberto Corrà, Alessandro Magnatta, Marta Donati, Valentina Ruffo di Calabria, Alice Verdelli, Alessio Coi, Emiliano Antiga, Marzia Caproni

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPemphigusImmunopathologyMEDLINEParaneoplastic pemphigusAutoimmune disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The clinical, epidemiological and immunopathological profiles of atypical forms of pemphigus remain only partially known. OBJECTIVES: To define the clinical, epidemiological and immunological characteristics, therapies and outcomes in patients with atypical pemphigus variants. METHODS: This was a 14-year multicentre retrospective observational study (VARIANT_P) on atypical variants of pemphigus across Italy. We collected demographic, immunopathological and clinical data, as well as information on comorbidities and prescribed treatments. RESULTS: We enrolled 61 patients [female/male sex ratio 1.77; 13 paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP), 26 IgA pemphigus (PIgA), 22 pemphigus herpetiformis (PH)]. The median ages at onset and diagnosis were 70.6 (range 43.1-86.8) and 71.1 (range 46.9-86.9) for PNP; 62.2 (range 3.8-81.0) and 63.6 (range 4.0-82.4) for PIgA; and 49.4 (range 5.4-84.4) and 52.3 (range 5.9-85.9) for PH, respectively. The median diagnostic delay was 3.0 (range 0.0-45.6) months for PNP, 9.5 (range 1.0-140.0) months for PIgA and 2.0 (range 0-30.4) months for PH. The mortality rate was 55% (6/11) for PNP, 4% (1/26) for PIgA and 6% (1/17) for PH. Cutaneous involvement was present in all patients with PIgA and PH, and in 83% (10/12) of the patients with PNP. In contrast, oral mucosal involvement was observed in all patients with PNP with data (n = 12), but only in 8% (2/26) of those with PIgA and 21% (4/19) of those with PH. Histology, direct immunofluorescence, indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay data demonstrated variable concordance with previously known data. Comorbidities included mainly solid malignancies for people with PNP, whereas cardiovascular and metabolic diseases were the most prevalent for those with PIgA and PH. Treatment mostly relied on systemic steroids and rituximab. CONCLUSIONS: The VARIANT_P study contributes to data collection relating to atypical pemphigus variants in order to promote the development of specific therapeutical guidelines in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Experimental DermatologySame topicAutoimmune Bullous Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207