MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415071816 · doi:10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100404

Impact of severe obesity on heart transplantation outcomes: A meta-analysis of survival and complications

2025· review· en· W4415071816 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Maria Bicudo Diniz, Sofia Wagemaker Viana, Anaís Concepción Marinho Andrade de Moura, Beatriz Laus Pereira Lima, Niti Dalal, Aabha Divya

Bibliographic record

VenueJHLT Open · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSevere obesityObesityHeart transplantationHeart failureTransplantationHeart diseaseWeight lossMetabolic syndrome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Heart transplantation (HT) is the standard treatment for end-stage heart failure, but severe obesity (Body Mass Index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg/m²) is linked to worse outcomes and is considered a relative contraindication. Obese patients face increased perioperative risks, longer wait times, and reduced survival, though improved clinical care may mitigate some effects. As obesity rates rise, the suitability of the current BMI is increasingly debated. Evidence remains limited and inconsistent, highlighting a need for clearer guidance. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the impact of severe obesity on survival and post-transplant complications in HT recipients. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251036442). We included cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (2000-2025) comparing outcomes in adult heart transplant recipients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² vs lower BMI. Primary outcomes were mortality and post-transplant complications. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Multiple reviewers did data extraction and bias assessment (ROBINS-I) independently. Random-effects models were used for statistical analysis, with heterogeneity assessed via I², and sensitivity analyses performed. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots. Results: The search strategy retrieved 1,697 articles or abstracts, 595 were excluded for being duplicates, and 59 full-text articles were selected for full-text analysis. Of these, 9 cohorts were included, 7 from the United States and 2 from Canada, with 218,272 patients, of whom 206,459 had a BMI < 35 and 11,813 had a BMI ≥ 35kg/m². Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²) remains associated with higher rates of infection, graft failure, and post-transplant mortality, despite advances in care. These outcomes likely reflect underlying immune and metabolic dysfunctions in obese patients, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies to improve long-term survival after heart transplantation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.791

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.310
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJHLT OpenSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207