MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415076096 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116569

Optimizing the layout of geothermal energy piles to minimize ground temperature changes

2025· article· en· W4415076096 on OpenAlexafffund
Kourosh Gholami, Yunting Guo, Chengkai Fan, Wei Victor Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Buildings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Superposition principleComputationGeothermal gradientThermalFinite element methodEfficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)Geothermal energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A new framework optimizes GEP layouts to reduce ground temperature changes (ΔT g ). • The surface temperature effect on GEP layout design is considered for the first time. • Computation time reduced by over 95% compared with classical methods. Geothermal energy piles (GEPs) are increasingly used in building foundations to provide sustainable heating and cooling. However, their operation can lead to undesirable changes in ground temperature (ΔT g ), which may reduce system efficiency and structural safety. Minimizing ΔT g is therefore critical in cold climates, where temperature drops may induce ground freezing and potentially affect the bearing capacity of foundation piles. To address this challenge and enhance the performance of GEPs, this study proposes a novel framework that optimizes their layout to minimize ΔT g during operation. In the framework, the finite element method (FEM) simulates the thermal response of energy piles, the genetic algorithm (GA) optimizes their layout, and the superposition principle reduces computational cost by decomposing complex simulations into simpler sub-problems. The framework also included the effect of ground surface temperatures and significantly reduced the computational time by over 95 % compared with classical methods. The study found that the framework allocated more GEPs to the areas with higher rather than lower ground surface temperatures to minimize ΔT g in a geothermal field. Moreover, using the optimal layout, the framework achieved a more significant reduction in ΔT g when using fewer GEPs. Notably, this reduction in ΔT g could reach 1.9 °C. Finally, the proposed framework significantly reduced computational time compared with other simulation methods. In conclusion, the proposed framework optimizes GEP layouts efficiently, offering valuable insights for the design of geothermal systems under various ground surface temperature conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy and BuildingsSame topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207