MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415076916 · doi:10.51910/ijhdr.v25icf.1573

Homeopathy on the integrative care of cocaine-related disorders (Cocacrack-3 Study): Updated Protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover clinical trial

2025· article· en· W4415076916 on OpenAlexaff
U. Adler, Karen Berenice Denez, Maria Lí­gia dos Reis Bellaguarda, Lia Lira Olivier Sanders, Eugênio de Moura Campos, Tainá Rocha Josino, Rinaldo Luíz Caraciolo Ferreira, Erlandson Uchôa Lacerda, Elaine Cristina Coelho Baptista, Javier Salvador Gamarra, Maristela Schiabel Adler, Edson Zangiacomí Martínez

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of High Dilution Research - ISSN 1982-6206 · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Pharmacists Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomeopathyProtocol (science)Clinical trialPlaceboCrossover studyAlternative medicineInclusion and exclusion criteriaPsychosocial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Effective pharmacotherapy for Cocaine Use Disorder is needed. The Cocacrack-2 study showed that homeopathic fifty-millesimal potencies of Opium and Erythroxylum coca were more effective than a placebo in reducing cocaine/crack use. However, the study experienced high dropout rates, which are common in the study population but could introduce bias. Therefore, further research is needed, focusing on strategies to ensure trial patient retention. The Cocacrack-3 study protocol initially aimed to improve retention through home visits from Primary Care. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we revised the protocol to utilize specialized facilities with network support and telemedicine follow-up to enhance retention. Objectives: 1) Assess the effectiveness and safety of sequential administration of homeopathic potencies (LM2, LM4, LM6) of Opium and Erythroxylum coca in reducing cocaine use. 2) Evaluate the effectiveness of telemedicine and support networks in enhancing treatment retention. Setting: Psychosocial Attention Centers for Alcohol and other Drugs (CAPS-AD) in Florianópolis, São José, and Palhoça, Brazil. Study center: Research Laboratory for the History of Nursing and Health Knowledge at the Federal University of Santa Catarina. Methods: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover clinical trial (six weeks per participant). Hypothesis: H0: No significant difference between homeopathic potencies and placebo. H1: Significant difference between homeopathic potencies and placebo. Inclusion criteria: Men and women aged 18-70, patients at CAPS-AD, with a support network. Exclusion criteria: Remission of cocaine use > two weeks, inability to participate virtually. Sample size: 120 participants, randomized 1:1 to verum or placebo sequences. Interventions: LM2, LM4, LM6 potencies of Opium and Erythroxylum coca, or placebo. Primary measure: Percentage of cocaine use days at week 3. Secondary measures: Cocaine use days, craving, progression, concomitant medications, adverse events, treatment adherence, and participant retention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.541
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of High Dilution Research - ISSN 1982-6206Same topicComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207