MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415086323 · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123226

Viscum album in French forests: Distribution, environmental drivers and impacts on tree health and growth

2025· article· en· W4415086323 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Baptiste Daubrée, Claire Depardieu

Bibliographic record

VenueForest Ecology and Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViscum albumAbiotic componentBiodiversityCrown (dentistry)Scots pineTree healthHabitatBiotic componentInfestationClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The European mistletoe ( Viscum album ) is represented in France by three subspecies and plays a dual role in ecosystems. While it provides essential food and habitat for numerous animal species, it also reduces the economic value of timber and weakens trees, making them more vulnerable to biotic and abiotic stressors. This study leveraged the French National Forest Inventory dataset, comprising observations from over 737,000 trees across more than 80,000 plots, to investigate the environmental factors shaping mistletoe distribution and assess its impacts on tree health and growth performance. Our findings revealed that mistletoe distribution is not random within the range of its host species but is significantly influenced by climate and soil conditions, as well as by the history of forest use. V . a . album was primarily constrained by soil properties, whereas V. a. abietis and V. a. austriacum were strongly affected by isothermality. Additionally, mistletoe was more frequently observed on trees with a higher crown dieback and, for Scots pine and silver fir, trees with a high level of infestation exhibited a growth reduction of 23–34 % compared to non-parasitized individuals. Fir and pine mistletoe occurrences were significantly lower in species-rich stands and in younger forests compared to older ones. With the ongoing impacts of climate change, implementing fine-scale monitoring of mistletoe populations could help foresters mitigate mistletoe-induced economic losses while simultaneously supporting biodiversity conservation efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForest Ecology and ManagementSame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207